You Can Expect To See

Source: CC0/Unsplash

Obi-Wan Kenobi in one case advised Luke Skywalker to not trust his eyes, because "your eyes can deceive you." Most of united states tin can recall an case from our own non-Jedi lives when these words rang truthful. Think of a time when your eyes saw what they wished to run across: a person you were thinking near on a busy street, a middle-shaped pebble you were looking for on the beach.

This phenomenon, called motivated perception, has been explored in psychological research for decades. Indeed, the world as we conceive it in our awareness is not exactly an accurate representation of what it truly is. Our perception is often biased, selective, and malleable.

Even our desires can affect what we see by impacting the style we process visual information. For example, when presented with an ambiguous effigy that could be interpreted either as the letter of the alphabet B or the number xiii, participants in one report were more likely to written report seeing that which aligned with desirable outcomes over less desirable ones (in this case, drinking orange juice if they saw a letter, or drinking a foul-smelling smoothie if they saw a number).

In an earlier study from 1954, when students from rival universities watched the aforementioned football game game, controversy and disagreement ensued, since the students reported seeing more fouls committed by the other squad.

Why are nosotros decumbent to seeing what we want to encounter? Contempo enquiry published in Nature Human Behavior demonstrates how our motivations and desires can requite rising to two biases: a perceptual bias (when our motivations take a top-down influence on our perceptions) and a response bias (when we study seeing what nosotros wish to run across). The written report, led by researchers from Stanford University, explores how these biases bear upon our perceptions. It proposes underlying neurocomputational mechanisms that guide these judgments.

The report

While in an fMRI scanner, participants performed a visual categorization task. They were presented with blended images that depicted a mixture of a face (male/female person) and a scene (indoor/outdoor) in varying proportions. Participants had four seconds to decide whether the image had "more than face" or "more than scene," earning money for each correct categorization. The researchers and so manipulated the participants' motivation to see one blazon of prototype over another (for example, a face over a scene) by informing them that they could win (or lose) actress money if the next image they saw turned out to be of a particular category (a face).

The results showed that the participants tended to demonstrate biases in their perceptual judgments that aligned with their motivations and wishes. Namely, they tended to characterization the cryptic images as displaying the category associated with the reward (face). This occurred even when their perceptions were wrong, leading to monetary losses. Thus, the wish to run into a certain image affected the participants' judgment, reflecting both a perceptual as well as a response bias—they not simply tended to report seeing what they had wished to run into, but they were also more than probable to actually see what they wished to encounter.

How do we make perceptual judgments?

How did the participants of the study make up one's mind whether they were looking at a face or at a scene? It all begins in the eyes. The information travels from the eyes to the principal visual cortex in the occipital lobe of the brain.

One theory (two-streams hypothesis) suggests that data is further processed in ii visual streams: the ventral stream, which is thought to exist responsible for encoding what we are looking at; and the dorsal stream, which identifies where inside our environment the visual event occurs.

In the ventral stream, there are specific areas containing neurons that are more selective for perceiving faces, and neurons that are more specialized in scenes. A perceptual judgment can then exist made by comparison the activity of the neurons in face up-selective or scene-selective regions: The region that shows more than activity should "win," and the category represented by these neurons should be selected.

What the results of the present study suggest is that the neurons in these regions can too be influenced by attentional and reward systems. In fact, researchers were able to investigate the corresponding neural mechanisms of the two biases and explore how the participants' motivation to see i category (face) over the other (scene) influenced their perceptual judgments.

As such, greater motivational biases were linked to more neural activity in ventral visual areas of the brain, while activity in the nucleus accumbens—a central region of the encephalon'south reward arrangement—correlated with participants' response biases.

Our desires and goals accept an undisputable influence on our lives. Every bit inquiry is demonstrating, these influences taint not only our cognition, emotions, and behavior, but as well—quite literally—how we run into the world.

According to lead author Yuan Chang Leong, their latest written report has 2 important implications. The first one has to do with our representation of the world. "In well-nigh cases, nosotros would like to have an objective view of reality in club to brand accurate judgments based on objective evidence. If we are aware of how desires colour our perception, we can take steps towards mentally correcting for the bias," says Leong.

The 2nd implication concerns the way we relate to others—in particular, those who don't share our desires and beliefs: "Knowing that others could truly be seeing things differently from us, and neither of us is necessarily closer to objective reality, nosotros would be meliorate able to empathize with how they act and feel." An insight—summoned from experiments in neuroscience and psychology—that would take probable aligned with Jedi wisdom.

Facebook paradigm: Pereslavtseva Katerina/Shutterstock

References

Leong, Y.C., Hughes, B.L., Wang, Y. & Zaki, J. (2019). Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying motivated seeing. Nature Human Behaviour https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0637-z

Kanwisher, Northward., McDermott, J., & Chun, Thou. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302-4311.

Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, Northward. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392(6676), 598.

Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: motivational influences on visual perception. Periodical of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 612.

Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game; a case study. The Periodical of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(1), 129.

You Can Expect To See,

Source: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/between-cultures/201907/why-we-see-what-we-want-see

Posted by: jacksonmallyn1966.blogspot.com

Share this post